If a buddy of mine hurt me and then made an effort to be

If a buddy of mine hurt me and then made an effort to be

Wait, why don't you? If a buddy of mine hurt me and then made an effort to be nice I would absolutely need to tell them I appreciate their efforts. Positive reinforcement is a great thing. It helps people behave better, who is to say it can't make a company act better also? If EA returned no advantages from"doing the bare minimum of human decency" then they wouldn't do even the bare minimum. It's worth rewarding them for it Madden 21 coins just like it is well worth rewarding a problem kid for doing their best to get daily. Benefits come from good behaviour, you should not be on good behavior for those added benefits. When I see EA contribute to the triggers or implement initiatives to help out black developers or matters of this type, then I will praise them. We only should require a higher standard and quit allowing firms off the hook easily. I'm of the mindset that cancel civilization is largely poor and people should be encouraged to change and enhance. But we should not let ourselves to be played by firms who are, at the end of the day, looking to remove all obstacles in the means of getting our money.

Benefits come from great behaviour, you shouldn't be on good behavior for those added benefits. "Everybody should only do the right thing" is a naive expectation. And I believe this is the case even for individuals too: if you need someone to act in a moral manner the ideal way to do that's to give them the ideal incentives and rewards to make acting morally the best and most attractive solution for them. If you do not then your society will probably be unstable.This is where I see this argument breaking . Corporations aren't people, they don't have any built-in moral instincts. If they behave , it's because they benefit, there's no other reason. Either because there's pressure internally from their employees to behave in ways consistent with the morals and beliefs of their employees, or outside pressure from governments or consumers. After I see EA contribute to the causes or implement initiatives to assist out black developers or items of this type, then I'll praise them. We simply should require a high standard and quit letting companies off the hook so easily.

Why not encourage them in doing both? Words are activities, in many cases. Placing out a statement of belief such as this isn't easy. I would hope they're also doing stuff things to create the lives of the black workers better but that does not mean I want to treat this as meaningless. Placing out a public statement is really a great step forwards for initiatives such as that, because if EA isn't doing enough then it is really simple for people tirelessly to say"Look, our actions are materially different from our stated values and we should do something about that." At the end of the day if you refuse to admit when a company makes a little step you love then how do they ever learn to generate a large step you love? You are treating this just like a political negotiation where earning this little concession means you won't have the negotiating power to make a bigger one later on. But I don't think that is how this works: EA is testing the waters and studying from their customers whether this is the type of thing they support or not. Is the lesson you would like them to learn from all this that human decency isn't worth appealing to buy mut coins madden 21 because it does not really affect purchasing decisions?

221 Views